From: mobileportland, 2 months ago
Firefox For Mobile Devices
SlideShare Link
I was also pleased to meet Gen, although we had not met each other, because I had seen his talk in the Lift conference and read his blog. So I felt like I was meeting people I was already acquainted with. In addition, he has already written about the Mozilla Korea Community activities and the unique situation of using ActiveX controls in Korea in his blog. So I'd like to thank him for his efforts.
Two kinds of test case are used.
- Tinderbox DHTML Test
- CSS Rendering
Target Device : PAX320, RAM 256MB
And I got the following results on TestGtkEmbed in Mozilla.
* Tinderbox DHTML Test:
The microB patched Mozilla is 2.2 % faster than Mozilla1.9 (Firefox alpah6 pre).
* CSS Rendering:
The microB patched Mozlla is 5.6 % slower (?) than Mozilla1.9
I applied the default patch set of microB to Mozilla1.9
I can't understand why the microB patches is slow in the case of CSS Rendering.
The following items are performance related patches in the default patch set.
#Performance improvements
perf_addon/attachment.cgi?id=246204.diff
perf_addon/new_cached_scale.gtk2.diff
perf_addon/bug54205.diff
perf_addon/540_BUG54340_js_malloc.diff
perf_addon/545_BUG54340_findkeyword_inline.diff
perf_addon/550_BUG54340_optimization_options.diff
perf_addon/thread_wait_block.diff
perf_addon/spidermonkey_alloc.diff
perf_addon/605_css_erros_parsing_disable.diff
I did not go through what each patch means.
Thanks